18-11-2006
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Board-Frischling
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Guadalajara, Mexico
Posts: 8
Abgegebene Danke: 0
Erhielt 0 Danke für 0 Beiträge
|
Very nice conclusion.
Quote:
|
Then I would say : Congratulations!
|
Thanks. 
Quote:
|
Therefore I never have stated that my offset is the absolute correct and only possible (zero) offset.
|
Thanks for being so honest.
Quote:
|
I will (can!) not change the offsets in EAC any more. Too many results and databases depends on the (now fixed) offset. The AccurateRip database had to be deleted completely and setup anew (and be populated) for changing the offset only by 1 sample...
|
Oh, pity 
Quote:
|
if you are perfectionist then you will probably not use EACs determined offset anymore...
|
Afirmative! 
Quote:
|
For other users (that may also be perfectionists to that level), please give the direction in which the absolute offset is 30 samples away from EACs? E.g. if EACs proposed read offset was +679 would the correct read offset be +649 or +709? Thanks! (If I need to guess, I would say it is 30 samples less, this would bring some Plextor drives exactly to a +0 read offset
|
Again, right. 
|
|
|