View Single Post
Old 20-11-2006   #10
JeanLuc
Registered User
Senior Member (Board-Inventar)
 
JeanLuc's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Cologne - Germany
Posts: 1.597
Abgegebene Danke: 0
Erhielt 0 Danke für 0 Beiträge
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquarium View Post
I don't know if this is helpful but after reading this thread I compared how a rip sounded with a Lite-On drive(+6 -6 EAC).First I ripped as I would normally with the prevous settings then I adjusted the read value to -24 to account for the postulated -30 that are missing from "true zero" offset.I hear a definite improvement in sound overall(Love And Theft-Bob Dylan).The "hissing" was removed from the drum cymbals in the foreground and seemed to be accurrate.Some more percussive details,all round,better enunciated vocal-the whole CD showed general improvement.I also left "no use of null samples" unchecked following another recent thread and I think this works to improve the sound also.It seems to make everything more "analogue" sounding as they say.
Excuse me ... but CD read offset correction has absolutely nothing to do with sound quality. It's just about getting a reference starting point for each track on the CD.
__________________
The Name was "Plex The Ripper", not "Jack The Ripper"
JeanLuc is offline