View Single Post
Old 25-09-2002   #5
Upp3rd0G
Registered User
Mitwirkender Frischling
 

Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: abc
Posts: 33
Abgegebene Danke: 0
Erhielt 0 Danke für 0 Beiträge
Quote:
Original geschrieben von Andre Wiethoff
If there is a skip in the resulting file that is too large for the analyser to handle, it will resynchronize itself to the old value and from then on most probably to the end show complete
I've added the logfiles and as can be seen in 3 out of 4 times there is a skip of 2939 samples...

I guess my scratches are too deep and not a representation of scratches caused by real life usage.

But I am still wondering what caused my drive not to skip during the last time I read it at max speed...
Upp3rd0G is offline   Reply With Quote